Taipei, March 8 (CNA) Science is often used as a political and economic bargaining chip in international talks on food safety, as seen in the recent dispute over beef between Taiwan and the United States, a former U.S. official said recently.
"The issues of agriculture and food safety are often used as chips for politicians. Unfortunately, I don't think these things will stop in the foreseeable future, " said Joseph Jen, an undersecretary for research, education, and economics in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from 2001-2005, in a March 4 interview with CNA.
"True science has been ignored so far, " said the 72-year-old scientist, who emigrated from Taiwan to the U.S. in 1962 and retired last year as the dean of the College of Agriculture at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo.
Political and economic factors are usually placed above food safety in most international agricultural negotiations because most countries send diplomatic officials, rather than scientists, to handle the talks, Jen said.
The recent dispute between Taiwan and the U.S. over imports of U.S. beef is just one example of the complexity that arises when
science is mixed with politics, he said.
Taiwan's legislature passed an amendment in January 2010 that banned imports of selected beef products from countries, including the U.S., with documented cases of mad cow disease in the past decade.
That meant that U.S. beef products seen as posing potentially health risks, such as ground beef and organs, were barred from entering Taiwan, in contravention of a bilateral beef trade protocol signed by the two countries in October 2009.
Tensions over beef arose again this past January, when American beef products found to contain residues of ractopamine -- a feed additive promoting leanness in livestock that is banned in Taiwan -- were taken off the shelves of local stores.
The move prompted the U.S. to call off a long anticipated meeting under the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) , an official framework for Taiwan-U.S. dialogue on trade and economic issues in the absence of diplomatic ties.
Jen said Taiwan's decision in 2010 was not based on scientific research, because the probability of contracting mad cow disease by consuming U.S. beef was lower than being hit by a car.
As for this year's dispute, Jen said Taiwan cited the European Union's zero tolerance policy on ractopamine to justify the ban and would wait for the conclusions of a meeting of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in July that will set maximum residue levels for ractopamine before reconsidering the issue.
But even then, politics and science are mixing because the EU and the Codex both have been heavily influenced by politics, Jen said.
"Its (the Codex's) science is politically approved science, not the real science, " he said, calling the EU "the main culprit" of mixing science with politics, starting with its condemnation of U.S.-produced genetically modified organism (GMO) products.
Food safety is a complicated issue because many people and processes are involved in the production chain, said Jen, who received his bachelor's degree in agricultural chemistry from National Taiwan University in 1960.
"The keys for modern-day scientists are 'probability' and 'risk assessment' as there is no such thing as a 'zero risk.' There is no magic wand which can solve anything in a blink of an eye either, " he said.
Jen acknowledges, however, that it always takes a long time for scientists to conduct research and reach a consensus, and before that happens, every government gets to make its own policies and decisions.
"I don't think I am in a position to recommend to Taiwan's government what to do. I think it will do what it thinks is the best for the people of Taiwan," said Jen, who was visiting Taiwan for the first time in 23 years.
He urged the media to play a positive role in promoting food safety and relaying accurate messages to people, because media reports too often cause panic by magnifying negative effects. (By Chris Wang) Enditem/ls