Friday, January 03, 2014

Discussions held on creation of new political group

PEOPLE POWER:Lin Feng-jeng said that the idea was only just forming, but the party would not be the same as the existing parties, instead focusing on social movements
By Chris Wang  /  Staff reporter

Social activists, academics and former politicians have held discussions on the establishment of a new political group to maximize people power and to voice their disgust at the way party politics currently functions in Taiwan.

“The idea is still in its early stages, but one thing is sure: The group will not be a conventional political party like the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT),” former executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), who has been actively involved in the campaign, told the Taipei Times yesterday.

Among the groups and individuals involved in the discussions were former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), Academia Sinica research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and activist group Citizen 1985, Lin said.

Those at the meeting hope the deliberation of policy, rather than party interests and elections, will be placed higher on the national political agenda.

The campaign was initiated for a number of reasons, Lin added.

He said that “the energy generated by social movements appears to have reached its peak and has not received sufficient positive feedback after three decades of work.”

Social activists “have not witnessed any positive effects of competition between political parties despite the two regime changes Taiwan has been through,” Lin said.

Advocates for social change have mostly intentionally stayed away from party politics, Lin said, adding that most found that this approach did not help them achieve their goals.

Lin said most people he talked to were especially disappointed at the DPP, a traditional ally of social activists and not-for-profit organizations, saying that the party was afraid of being “too progressive” on various social issues and hurting its election chances.

“The truth is that the DPP has now fallen behind civil groups on issues of environmental protection, pension reform and the cross-strait service trade agreement, to name but a few,” Lin said.

The planned political group has no timetable on its establishment and naming, but does not rule out participating in the legislative elections in 2016 to vie for at-large legislative seats, Lin said.

With regards to the group’s position on independence and unification, an issue that is almost certain to be raised, Lin said that the group would take a different approach to the issue.

“The consensus we’ve had so far is that our sovereignty should not be interfered with by exterior forces. Safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty is more important to us than the independence-unification issue,” he said.

If established, the group could have the potential to compete for voter support with the nation’s main parties, the DPP, the KMT, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and the People First Party (PFP).

Lin said if the group was to participate in elections, it would try to garner nonpartisan support rather than pattern itself after the DPP-TSU model.

“The TSU simply chipped voter support away from the DPP, which is not helpful in changing the domestic political map,” Lin said.

“We don’t want that to happen,” he added.